I am absolutely clear that there is no place in civilised society for so-called “conversion therapy”.
I take this subject very seriously. I am aware that there are differing views on proposals for legislation and have made considerable efforts to listen to as many organisations and individuals as possible, both nationally and locally, to enable myself to understand the full range of opinion. Crucial to this has been hearing from individuals who have been forced to undergo “conversion therapy” and others who have suffered discrimination, abuse or aggression because of their sexuality or gender identity. I have heard incredibly distressing accounts. So I am pleased that the Government will legislate to ban “conversion therapy”.
As you may be aware, the Government ran a consultation on its proposed legislation. This was extended until February this year to allow ample opportunity for all those who wished to contribute their views to do so, including faith groups, LGBT organisations, counselling bodies and charities.
Following this consultation, the Government is proceeding with its proposals to ban conversion therapy for lesbian, gay, and bi-sexual people. Being lesbian, gay or bisexual is not an illness to be treated or cured. I am both reassured and encouraged that this view is shared by the head of the NHS, the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the UK Council for Psychotherapy, the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy and the British Medical Association. Each of these bodies has concluded that such “therapy” is unethical and potentially harmful. It is therefore right that the Equalities Office remains committed to tackling “conversion therapy” for these groups in the UK.
However, it has become clear that it is necessary for separate, additional work to be carried out on the issue of transgender “conversion therapy”, so we can be sure that any new laws do not have any unintended consequences. This is a legally complex area, and the Government have a responsibility to ensure that no unintended consequences are written into legislation, particularly where they might affect children. On the basis of everything I have heard so far, I do not believe that it would be right for children to take irreversible decisions about treatments and their bodies without adult involvement and a full exploration of all the possible consequences. It is important that discussions and advice can be provided without fear of breaking a law. As the Prime Minister has said, “These are complex issues and they can't be solved with one swift, easy piece of legislation. It takes a lot of thought to get this right." I can reassure you that the results of the additional work being carried out will be analysed carefully and will inform the Government's next steps in preparing legislation.